Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19819 (KAR)

CHANDRASHEKAR MAYYA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7527/2025 · 2025-04-16

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15747 WP No. 7527 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 7527 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRASHEKAR MAYYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE GANAPATHI MAYYA R/AT BAYAMBE HOUSE, NEHRU NAGAR KASABA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK PUTTUR, DK - 574 203. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN .B.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER PUTTUR CITY POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. NAGAPPA BENAKATTI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS PUTTUR TOWN POLICE STATION PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE DK - 574 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15747 WP No. 7527 of 2025 PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO. 9/2024, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM COURT, PUTTUR, D.K REGISTERED BY THE PUTTUR POLICE SO FOR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNERD FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC 66E, 67(A) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND UNDER SEC 4 AND 6 OF INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER DICTATION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner (accused No.2), who has been charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 4 and 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, is before this Court seeking appropriate relief. 2. The prosecution alleges that a Police Constable, serving at the Puttur City Police Station, was assigned beat duty within the jurisdiction of Puttur Taluk. As part of his routine duties, he patrolled the area, interacted with local residents and informants to address public grievances, and monitored illegal activities. On 02.07.2019, during his beat patrol, an informant - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15747 WP No. 7527 of 2025 reported the circulation of an obscene video depicting a group of students engaging in indecent physical acts in a public place. One of the boys was allegedly seen recording the act, and all individuals involved appeared to be college students. The circulation of this obscene video among the public is said to have disrupted the peace in the locality, caused dishonour to women, and posed a threat to public order. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the State. 4. The allegations made against the petitioner disclose the commission of the offences as stated in the charge sheet. The veracity of these allegations can be determined only during the course of the trial by the competent court. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application for discharge and to raise all contentions urged before this Court during the course of trial. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:15747 WP No. 7527 of 2025 6. If such an application for discharge is filed, the Trial Court shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law and on its own merits. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE MKM/NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 74