Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198172 (ALL)

SURESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1096/2025 · 2025-10-17

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1096 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner's counsel says that there was a Nali existing in the Abadi which got destroyed as a result of which the water flows into the nearby houses thereby making life unhygienic for the residents. 3. Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gram Panchyat accepts the fact that Nalis are constructed by the Gram Pradhan under Section 15 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. 4. Let the Gram Panchayat i.e. opposite party no.6 look into the matter and do the needful at the earliest. If any assistance is required from the revenue authorities, the same shall be provided. If nothing happens within six weeks, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach this Court again. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Shanu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyan Chandra Dubey, Aman Kumar, Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Suresh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench