MOHD. ARSHAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/19247/2018 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 19247 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Pratap Yadav, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Shiv Sharma (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mohd. Arshad Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench