GIRJASHANKAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/13013/2025 · 2025-11-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198156 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198156 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13013 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arun Pratap Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties for considering the petitioner for making compassionate appointment on the post of Driver in Corporation under the Dying in Harness Rule 1974 within short and reasonable period prescribed by this Hon'ble court." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya the opposite party no. 3 may be
directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Girjashankar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. November 10, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13013 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench