E=i=_`ar E=]- _ .. `~< `. lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.I 5728 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Kokjla, w/o Gunasekhar, aged 49 years, R/o. Kaljyambakam HarI'J-anaWadaVl'Ilage, VI'jayapuram Mandal, chittoor DistrI'Ct 2. Gunasekhar, s/o K.Krishnaiah, aged 54 years, R/o. Kaliyambakam Harijanawada village, Vijayapuram Mandal, chjttoor DI-StrI-Ct 3. Vijayan, s/o K.Chengaiah, aged 43 years, R/o. Kaliyambakam Harijanawada village, VI'jayaPuram Mandal, chI'ttoOr District ...Petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4 AND The State of Andhra pradesh, rep by I'tS PubII'C Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra pradesh at Amaravati .I.Respondent/comp]ajnan€ petitI-On under SectI'On 482 of BNSS prayI'ng that 1-n the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the c'rI'minaI Petition, the High court may be pleased to dI'reCt the Station House officer, vijayapuram police Stall-On tO release the petitioners/accused No.2 to 4 in the event of theI'r arrest jn connectI-On WI-{h Cr.No.19/2025 of Vjjayapuram police Station, chittoor Distrl'ct. I The PetI'tiOn COmjng on for hearl'ng, upon perusing the petjtjon and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate for the petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the court made the foIIowl-ng LL Betwee n : Kokila and Others AND The State Of Ap counsel for the petitioner/accused(s): 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., is filed by the petitioners herein/A2 to A4 seeking to grant an{icipatory bail I'n Crime No.19 of 2025 of Vijayapuram Police Station, Chittoor District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 69 read with 3(5) of BNS. 2. Brief facts of the case are. that, the accused No.1 and the complainant loved each other and had romantic relationship. The accused No.1 promised to marry her and engaged in physical relationship since 2021. However, after securing the job, the accused No.1 refused to marry the complainant and A2, A3 and A4 who are family members Of Al supported the Al and refused tO allow the marriage. Hence the FIR. 4` E= 3. Heard Mr.D.Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners herein are innocent of the offences alleged against them and they have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that all the said allegations were invented with a view to implicate the petitioners in a false criminal case in order to bring accused No.1 to the illegal terms of the de-facto complainant by putting pressure on them. 6. On the contrary, learned Assistant Public prosecutor vehemently opposed grant of bail and urged to dismiss the criminal petition. 7. Apparently, the petitioners herein, who are parents and maternal uncle of Accused No.1 did not have any role in the alleged relationship between the Accused No.1 and the de-facto complainant. As such, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 to 4, with the following conditions.- i. ln the event of arrest of the petitioners, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer; il-. The petitioners shall mark their attendance before the Investigating officer once in a fortnight i.e., on lSt and 15th of every month between 10.00 A.M and 01 :00 P.M., till filing of the iji. charge sheet. The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation by a police officer as and when required, and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to ----- -_- - ` . dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or tO any police officer. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT SECTION OFFICER REGffiAR \ a ft, I-.I,_ Fort Tol 1,. The Station House Officer, Vijayapuram Police Station, Chittoor District I 2. One CC to SRl. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy PSR HIGH COURT \ _-` ,€ MRK,J DATED : 05/06/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5728 of 2025 ALLOWED ha.iv1,.-``b`=`'~,`- FgrirfyNINle I8 Sdrff#ffi \EL B huN \\\\ - .r~irfitpr}