Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010217362022 2025:GAU-AS:13644 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/625/2022 PARTHA PRATIM SEN AND 2 ORS. S/O PARIMAL CHANDRA SEN, VILL- MADHABPUR, P.O.-KARICHERRA BAZAR, P.S.-RAMNATH, DIST- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788165 2: PARIMAL CHANDRA SEN S/O LATE PRONOY CHANDRA SEN VILL-MADHABPUR P.O.-KARICHERRA BAZAR P.S.-RAMNATH DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788165 3: BIPLOB DEB S/O LT. BORODA KANTA DEB VILL AND P.O.-MONIPUR BAGAN P.S.-KATLICHERRA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78881 VERSUS SUBIMAL KULI AND ORS. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (NH), GOVT. OF ASSAM, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-03 2:BISHNU PRASAD DAS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD KARIMGANJ N.H. DIVISION KARIMGANJ DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788806 Page No.# 2/3 3:HIVARE NISARY GAUTAM IAS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI P.O. AND P.S.-HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI PIN-788151 4:SHRI RAJ CHAKRABARTY THE COMMISISIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF P.W.D. (BUILDING AND NATIONAL HIGHWAY)ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S B LASKAR, MS N KALITA,MR. H A LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R DHAR, MR D KALITA (R-3),MR. D NATH (R-3),MR T A SHOHE,MS TOSHISENLA,MR. R DHAR,MR T A SHOHE,MS TOSHISENLA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 13.10.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. 2. Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 3 has placed the order dated 05.10.2024 issued by the District Commissioner Hailakandi, whereby sanction has been granted for the withdrawal of the dues of the petitioners No. 2 and 3 who were also petitioners in WP(C)951/2019. 3. Mr. Nath, has drawn our attention in paragraph 9 of the order dated 10.02.2022 passed in WP(C) NO. 951/2019, which states that this Court had Page No.# 3/3 ordered the respondent authorities to examine and disburse the amounts of Rs. 4,03,879/- and Rs. 5,84,724/- in favour of the petitioners No. 2 & 3 respectively. 4. Mr. Naths submits that vide the order dated 05.10.2024, the said sanction had been accorded and the branch manager of the Bank of India, Hailakandi, was also requested to debit to the amounts of the accounts of the respective petitioners. 5. Today, none has appeared for the petitioners. 6. Since, substantial compliance of the orders of this Court has been placed before this Court, the contempt petition is closed with the liberty to the petitioners to agitate their other grievances, if any, regarding the issue in an appropriate forum in an appropriate proceeding. 7. This contempt petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant