MOHIT SONI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
NABAIL/1600/2025 · 2025-10-28
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1600 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Present Anticipatory bail application has been filed in case crime No. 134 of 2025 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.Harchandpur, district Raebareli. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, one case has been shown against the applicant. In that case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail order is on record. It is submitted that the co-accused Shubham Mishra alias Chintu alias Sintu has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 19.9.2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail No.1262 of 2025. The applicant seeks parity. It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohit Soni .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
4. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. 5.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, bail order of the co-accused, noted above, and judgment of Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another (2020)5 SCC 1 and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such appearance, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/SHO concerned. The applicant shall cooperate in the investigation/trial, and he will not influence the witnesses. 7.
In case of default, it would be open for the investigating officer to move application for vacation of this protection. 8. The application is allowed accordingly. October 28, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1600 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench