Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19813 (CHH)

RAIPUR POWER AND STEEL LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1653/2020 · 2025-03-25

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14310 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1653 of 2020 1. Raipur Power And Steel Limited A Company Formed And Constituted Under The Companies Act, 1956 And An Existing Company Within The Meaning Of The Companies Act. 2013 Having Its Works At Plot No. 75- 76, Industrial Growth Centre Borai, District- Durg, 491001, C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2. Mr. Sandeep Kumar S/o Ranbir Singh Aged About 33 Years Occupier, Raipur, Power And Steel Limited, And Resident Of 75-76, Industrial Growth Centre Borai, District- Durg, 491001, C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Labour, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Appellate Authority Building And Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 P-3, C-244-45, Housing Board Colony, Sector 27, New Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Assessing Officer Building And Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 Office Of Deputy Director, Industrial Health And Safety 101, Housing Board Apartment, Raipur, Naka, Dirg Division, District- Durg, C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Collector Durg, District- Durg, C.G., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None, even in second round For State/ Respondents : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.03.25 17:06:27 +0530 2 25-03-2025 1) Earlier, when the matter was taken up for hearing, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner. Again, in second round, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2) It appears that the petitioner has lost her interest in the pursuing the matter. 3) Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed on this count alone. Interim relief granted earlier is hereby vacated. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya