Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198125 (ALL)

BHARATRAM VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9532/2025 · 2025-10-10

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9532 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Divya Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers : "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party nos.1 to 3 to conduct a fair and proper investigation in pursuance of First Information Report dated 17.09.2025 in Case Crime No.0308 of 2025, under Section 137(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi, contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party nos.1 to 3 to ensure the protection of life of the petitioner and his family members against the threat by the accused persons, in the interest of justice." Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court the instructions dated 06.10.2025 sent by Shri Mahendra Saroj, Sub Inspector, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi, wherein it has been stated that the investigation has been completed and Final Report No.96 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025 has been filed before the supervisory authority i.e. Circle Officer, Gauriganj, District Gonda, and the same may be sent to the competent court very soon. A copy of such instructions is kept on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Nag Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Bharatram Vishwakarma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. However, it is always open to the petitioner or any aggrieved person to assail the final report by filing a protest application before the competent court or to prefer a representation against such final report before the supervisory authority, taking all pleas and grounds available to the aggrieved person. such an application may be considered and disposed of by the supervisory authority strictly in accordance with law, if such final report is not sent to the competent court. October 10, 2025 Mahesh CRLP No. 9532 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench