MOHD. YASEEN ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU. UP SHASHAN and OTHERS
WRIA/12322/2016 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12322 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratul Prakash Srivastava, Mohammad Aslam Beg, Rohitash Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chauhan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mohd. Yaseen Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Up Shashan And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench