Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198114 (ALL)

NEELU TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/3542/2024 · 2025-11-21

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3542 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Gaurav Shukla, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.4. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner and her friends in any manner. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this petition, decree of divorce has been passed by the competent Court, therefore, he may be permitted to not press this petition. To which learned A.G.A. and learned Counsel for the opposite party no.4 have no objection. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. November 21, 2025 Ajit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Gaurav Shukla, Sharad Pathak (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Neelu Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench