RAHUL SONI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/9927/2025 · 2025-10-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198106 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198106 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9927 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Sri Dev Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has no objection against the aforesaid prayer.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed leaving it open for the petitioner to avail any other remedy available to him under law. October 17, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Gautam, Dev Kumar Pandey, Ritu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Rahul Soni .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench