Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1981 (UTT)

ASHRAF v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/224/2025 · 2025-02-14

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 224 of 2025 Ashraf ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.01 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that based on one case, the applicant has been implicated in the case, but in the earlier case, the applicant has already been granted bail; the applicant is not a previous convict. 4. These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 14.02.2025 Ravi Bisht