Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19809 (GAU)

PULAK MALAKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3143/2025 · 2025-09-25

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010217402025 2025:GAU-AS:13544 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3143/2025 PULAK MALAKAR S/O MUKTA RANJAN MALAKAR R/O BADARPUR GHAT P.S. BADARPUR DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. I U CHOWDHURY,J M SULAIMAN,MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Barthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/2 2. The subsequent application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Pulak Malakar, has prayed for bail in connection with Silchar P.S. Case No. 786/2025 under Section 125/271/318(4)/319(2)/336(4)/ 340(2)/112(2) of BNS, 2023 added Section 110 of BNS. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is a subsequent bail petition as the earlier was rejected on 16.09.2025. That, considering the length of detention, bail may be considered. 4. Case diary, as called for, has been received. 5. Perused the relevant portions of the case diary. 6. Considering the serious nature of the allegation and the incriminating materials, it may not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, bail application stands rejected at this stage. 7. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant