1 2025:CGHC:8895 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1713 of 2020 • Gannon Dunkerley And Co. Ltd. Through Its CEO, Ravindra Kumar S/o Shri Shayam Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 603, Plot B-17, Marvel Homes Apartment Sector 61, Noida, District Gutam Bhudh Nagar Uttar Pradesh. Office At B-228, Okhla Industrial Area Phase 1, New Delhi - 110020 ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Environment And Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest (Wildlife) Chhattisgarh, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Environment And Forest, Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 4. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Road Development Corporation Limited (In Short CGRDC), Sirpur Bhawan Campus, Behind Akashwani, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 492001 5. Manager Finance, Chhattisgarh Road Development Corporation Limited (In Short CGRDC), Sirpur Bhawan Campus, Behind Akashwani, Civil Lines, Raipur,Chhattisgarh 492001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For Respondents No. and 2/State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20/02/2025 Heard on admission. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.i That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondents 1 to 3 to pass the speaking order in the pending representations of petitioner and also the respondents no/1&2 may be constituted the committee & conduct physical verification of Two laning with hard shoulder of chiphi – Rengakhar Salhewara Road Section from existing chainage KM 0.000 to Km. 60.826 (Design Chainage KM. 0.000 to Km 60.765) in which issue the ROW clearness & truth can be ascertained after giving full opportunity of hearing to all concern & by fixing the time bound period i.e. 30 days; 10.ii That, this Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents no/1&2 may be directed to make the high level enquiry against the responsible officers in according to facts & circumstances of case; 10.iii Any other relief, which this Honourable Court may, deems fit and proper may kindly be granted.” 2. None for the petitioner even in two round. 3. Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 and 2 would submit that the representations presented by the petitioner have already been decided by the respondent authorities vide speaking order dated 21.07.2020. He would submit that the petition deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 and 2. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent authorities to decide his pending representations and decision has already been taken by respondents No. 4 and 5 on 21.07.2020 on the representations of the petitioner, therefore, this petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti