MOHD. FAROOKH @ MOHD. FAROOK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/8190/2025 · 2025-10-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8190 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit and supplementary affidavit filed today are taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 101 of 2025, under Sections 302, 427, 120-B, IPC, P.S. Lalganj, District Pratapgarh.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co accused who were named in the FIR were enlarged on bail vide orders dated 9.1.2018, 28.8.2019 and 28.7.2025 passed in Bail No. 8113 of 2017, Criminal Revision No. 1031 of 2018 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 2223 of 2025 respectively. The applicant was subsequently named and is alleged to have been driving the vehicle in question.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that the co accused have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 31.5.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Mohd. Farookh @ Mohd. Farook be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Farookh @ Mohd. Farook .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 17, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8190 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench