Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198061 (ALL)

IRSHAD AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SPRCIAL SECY. DEPTT. OF NAGAR VIKAS ANUBHAG 6, LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15058/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15058 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since, the matter is being decided at the admission stage, notice to opposite party no. 3 is hereby dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devesh Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 and perused the records. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no.2 to forthwith implement and ensure compliance with the government order dated 30.04.2003 issued by opposite party no.1, with respect of the petitioner for transfer from Nagar Panchayat Kumarganj Ayodhya to his home district at Lucknow, contained as annexure no.1 to this writ petition. b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the opposite party no.2 to extend the same benefits as extended to other similar situated employees vide order dated 10.08.2022 and 15.12.2022 contained as Annexure No. 4 to this writ petition." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Director, Local Bodies Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Sahu, Deepti Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Irshad Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Sprcial Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Anubhag 6, Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/Director, Local Bodies Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15058 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench