Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198059 (ALL)

VINDESH KUMAR PANDEY AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

A482/10721/2025 · 2025-12-19

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10721 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Anand Pratap Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2,4, 5 and 6 which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2, 4, 5 and 6 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/FTC No. 2, Gonda in Session Trial No.358 of 2024, (State vs. Vindesh Kumar Pandey and ors) and charge sheet no. 2 of 2022, dated 29.3.2022 in case crime no.101 of 2021, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC, P.S. Tarabganj, District Gonda on the basis of compromise dated 23.10.2024 held in between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.1 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Nishad, Rajendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vindesh Kumar Pandey And 12 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 19, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10721 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench