Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198044 (MAD)

PRABHU SRINIVASAN v. G.SHANMUGA SUNDARAM

CRL OP/31109/2025 · 2025-11-14

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.11.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No. 31109 of 2025 & Crl.M.P.No. 21346 of 2025 Prabhu Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs. G.Shanmuga Sundaram ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate (FTC), Ambattur in Crl.MP.No.773 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr. M.Sathiavel 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 O R D E R This criminal original petition is filed to set aside the order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (FTC), Ambattur in Crl.MP.No.773 of 2025. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he has filed a petition seeking to recall the evidence of PW1, for further examination. However, the learned Trial Judge, without taking into consideration the fact that recall and cross-examination of the de facto complainant is necessary for arriving a decision, dismissed the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has failed to put certain questions to the de facto complainant (PW1) and therefore, the instant petition has been filed. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 records. 5. The STC is of the year 2020. The petition has been belatedly filed seeking to recall the evidence of PW1, at the time when the matter is posted for arguments and after trial has been completed. The learned Trial Judge has extensively dealt with the recall petition and dismissed the same and hence, I do not find infirmity in the order passed. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 14.11.2025 kan Neutral Citation:Yes/No 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate (FTC), 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 Ambattur. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. kan Crl.O.P.No. 31109 of 2025 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31109 of 2025 14.11.2025 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis