Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18494 of 2018 ====================================================== Rashmeet Singh Son of Sri Rajendra Sah Resident of M/S Bhargo Saw Mill Compound, Mithapur, P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Patna.
3. The Chief Municipal Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
4. The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna City, Patna.
5. Sri Sushil Kumar Mishra, Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna City, Patna.
6. The Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.
7. The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7883 of 2021 ======================================================
1. Rajendra Singh Son of Late Charan Singh Resident of M/s Bhargo Saw Mill, Compound, Mithapur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna.
2. Rashmeet Singh Son of Rajendra Singh Resident of M/s Bhargo Saw Mill, Compound, Mithapur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Patna.
3. The Chief Municipal Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
4. The Executive Officer, Patna City Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
5. The Executive Engineer, Patna City Division, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
6. The Tax Collector, Patna City Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
7. The Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.
8. The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
Patna High Court CWJC No.18494 of 2018(10) dt.16-09-2025 2/3 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18494 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Mistry, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Yogendra Pd. Sinha, Advocate (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7883 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Mistry, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kinkar Kumar, SC-09 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10 16-09-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents either to re-construct the Building, Show Room of M/s Guru Nanak Moto and the Main Gate of M/s Azad Saw Mill situated inside of N.H.30, Ranipur Paijawa Pahari, P.S. By-Pass, District-Patna or to pay the damage amounting to Rs.15 Lakh sustained by the Respondent No.4 & 5 as the Show Room of M/s Guru Nanak Moto and the Main Gate of M/s Azad Saw Mill has been broken/demolished through JCB on 24.8.2018 without any sanction of the court as well as to the contrary of Bihar Municipal Act,2007 and the Rules framed thereunder;
Patna High Court CWJC No.18494 of 2018(10) dt.16-09-2025 3/3 (ii) for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to initiate a Departmental Proceeding against the Respondent No.5 who has deliberately failed to discharge his official duty in broken/demolition of the shops of the petitioner and took away the articles amounting to Rs.2 to 2.50 Lakhs from the shop of the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case; (iii) for issuance of such other writ(s),
order(s), direction(s) as your Lordships may deem fit and proper..
3. Mr. Vinay Mistry, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petitions.
4. Accordingly, the same is/are dismissed as withdrawn.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U