BALASAHEB DNYANOBARAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
CA/6439/2024 · 2025-01-27
Shri S G Mehare, Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19803 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19803 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ca 6439.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6439 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2887 OF 2022 Balasaheb Dnyanobarao Patil .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Vikas G. Kodale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 27TH JANUARY, 2025.
ORDER : . Heard respective counsels. The applicant wants to add the respondent No. 5 as party respondent to the original writ petition. We are satisfied that there are sufficient reasons to add the present respondent No. 5 as party to the writ petition. Hence application is allowed. Amendment be carried out within a week.
2. If the amendment is carried out within prescribed period, issue notice to the added respondent No. 5, returnable on
24.02.2025.
[SHAILESH P. BRAHME J.] [S. G. MEHARE, J.] bsb/Jan. 25