PAWAN TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. TRHU. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/9177/2025 · 2025-10-27
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9177 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel for respondent no.1 to 7 and Sri Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent.8.
2. With the consent of parties, the petition is being disposed of today.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents not to harass the petitioner illegally and to stop the inquiry, if any proposed in the matter unless he is provided the copy of the complaint to enable him to join the inquiry.
4. The contention of petitioner is that he had lodged the F.I.R. vide Case Crime No. 500/2024, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 126(2), 109 B.N.S. at Police Station P.G.I., Lucknow. In a counter-blast an F.I.R. vide Case Crime No.105/2025, under Section 131, 115(2), 351(3), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station P.G.I, Lucknow was lodged against him. Petitioner is being repeatedly called before the authorities for recording of statement, but neither any detail nor copy of complaint have been given to him.
5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions dated 13.08.2025 sent by Sri Ramesh Kumar Bharti, Police Headquarters, Lucknow states that despite notices having been sent to the petitioner, he has failed to present himself for recording of statement. Learned A.G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Komal Prasad Tiwari, Malik Faiyaz Ahmed Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Pawan Trivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Trhu. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
further states that in case petitioner presents himself for recording of statement then his statement would be recorded.
6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to report before the authority concerned on 29.10.2025 on which date his statement would be recorded and the petitioner would be made available the material which he requires. October 27, 2025 Arti/- CRLP No. 9177 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench