INDRAJEET PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8600/2025 · 2025-10-17
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8600 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant seeking quashing of the impugned chargesheet dated 04.03.2024 filed in Case Crime No. 37 of 2024 under Sections 447, 504, 506, 352, I.P.C., P.S. Kadipur, District Sultanpur, and the order of cognizance dated 11.03.2024 passed by/pending in the court of Learned IIIrd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Sultanpur, in Crl. Case No. 7483/2024 "State Vs. Indrajeet & others" and entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application within four weeks from today and in case any such application is being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Indrajeet Prajapati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. October 17, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 8600 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench