Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197978 (ALL)

ARPITA MISHRA @ ARPITA TRIPATHI v. NAVEEN CHANDRA TRIPATHI

A227/6026/2025 · 2025-10-15

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6026 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Arpita Mishra-the petitioner in person in view of request made by her that although she has engaged four learned counsel to represent her and their names have been shown in the cause list none of them have appeared to assist the court. Keeping in view the fact that none of the learned counsel are present in the court to advance submissions the court grants permission to petitioner in person to advance submissions. 2. Keeping in view the nature of relief sought and the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the opposite party is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow for expeditious disposal of Case No.263 of 2020: Smt. Arpita Mishra @ Arpita Tripathi Vs. Naveen Chandra Tripathi and another, filed under Section 7, 12, 25 of Guardians and Wards Act. 4. A copy of order sheet of trial court annexed with the petition indicates that issues have been framed by the trial court on 07.02.2023 and now the matter is being fixed for hearing. 5. Child custody matters are required to be dealt with expeditiously Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Shukla, Neelanjali Gupta, Satyendra Kumar Mishra, Utkarsh Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arpita Mishra @ Arpita Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Naveen Chandra Tripathi .....Respondent(s) as the question of welfare of child is of paramount consideration and there should not be any undue delay in disposal of such matters. 6. As the matter is ripe for hearing, the present petition is allowed. A direction is issued to the learned Additional Principal Judge-VI, Family Court, Lucknow to decide Case No.263 of 2020: Smt. Arpita Mishra @ Arpita Tripathi Vs. Naveen Chandra Tripathi and another, filed under Section 7, 12, 25 of Guardians and Wards Act expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. October 15, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6026 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench