RINKU YADAV (S.I. , CIVIL POLICE) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIA/11453/2025 · 2025-10-10
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197975 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197975 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11453 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging show cause notice dated 30th August 2025 requiring petitioner to submit a reply as to why his service may not be terminated. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that earlier petitioner's services were terminated vide order dated 27th May 2023 which was challenged in writ A No. 9183 of 2025 and was allowed vide judgment and order dated 18th August 2025 primarily on the ground that the termination order had been passed without affording opportunity of hearing. It is submitted that liberty was granted to opposite parties to pass orders afresh after affording opportunity of hearing but the show cause notice has been issued without reinstating petitioner as was required as a consequence of the judgment and order dated 18th August 2025. 4. Learned State Counsel has not been provided any instructions in this matter despite time having been granted time twice on 24th September 2025 and 6th October 2025. 5. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties, it is evident that the impugned show cause notice dated 30th August 2025 has been issued in pursuance of directions issued by this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rinku Yadav (S.I. , Civil Police) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
Court in its judgment and order dated 18th August 2025 passed in writ A No. 9183 of 2025. In such circumstances, this Court does not find any occasion to interfere with the show cause notice. 6. However in view of the fact that the earlier termination order dated 27th May 2023 stood quashed by this Court in the earlier writ proceedings, the opposite parties are directed to reinstate petitioner in service prior to proceeding in pursuance of the show cause notice dated 30th August 2025. The proceedings in pursuance of the show cause notice shall abide by the directions issued by this Court in its judgment and order dated 18th August 2025. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
October 10, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 11453 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench