C.M.P.No. 14562 of 2025 in C.M.A. SR.No. 49102 of 2025 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J. [Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.] The petition has been filed with a delay of 98 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Notice has been served on respondents 1 to 4 and counsel has been engaged on their behalf. As far as the 5 th respondent is concerned, the private notice has been returned with the endorsement as “address not sufficient”. 3. From the records, we find even before the Tribunal, the 5 th respondent, who was arrayed as 1 st respondent, did not contest the proceedings and was set exparte. In such circumstances and since there is no objection from the contesting respondents, the petition seeking condonation of delay of 98 days is allowed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis [Dr.G.J., J.] & [M.S.K., J.] 28.11.2025 rpl Note: The Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis