HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11660 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers :- "(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.1 to 4 to decide early the petitioner application dated 20.11.2025 sent through registered post to opposite parties no.1 to 4 for fair and properly inquiry after then take legal action against opposite parties no.5 to 8 because together committed fraud by making a fake promise in the applicant's name and taking a commercial loan of Rs.900000/- (nine lakh rupees) and transferring it to their own acquaintances and embezzled the applicant's loan amount fraudulent with the applicant by the opposite party no.5 and 6 contained as Annexure 1 and 2 to this writ petition." It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the opposite parties no.7 and 8 without the applicant's knowledge have obtained GST registration for the applicant as SMSY Enterprises 555-46, Kanpur Raod, Lucknow which is another address of the applicant. The applicant could not come to know of such fraud being played by opposite parties no.7 and 8 with the collusion of current and ex Branch Manager of Bank of India, Branch- Jehta, police station - Dubagga, lucknow. Thereafter which was declared NPA in April 2025. Such commercial loan of Rs.900000/- was not taken by the petitioner, it was taken by respondents no.7 and 8. Applicant is a young man with no knowledge of any type of business. The petitioner has submitted an application/ complaint dated 20.11.2025 to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar, Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Nitin Srivastava Shivam Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Mini. Of Finance Jeevan Deep Building Sansad Marg New Delhi And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) authorities but nothing has been done in the matter and, therefore, this petition has been filed. Shri Nitin Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for Bank of India, Branch Jehta, Lucknow has produced before this Court a copy of the handwritten application of the Shivam Singh Yadav, i.e., petitioner dated 18.01.2025 wherein it has been stated that the petitioner had taken a commercial loan from the Bank of India Branch at Jehta but has suffered loss in business and, therefore, closed down the business. He was unable to return bank loan in time. He is now working in private job which is purely temporary and, therefore, some more time may be granted by the Bank to the petitioner to repay the loan with interest. The loan Account has been clearly mentioned in the said handwritten application which matches the loan account mentioned in the petitioner's application allegedly made to the Lokpal/Ombudsman of RBI. We find no good ground to show interference as prayed. Writ petition stands dismissed. December 8, 2025 mks WRIC No. 11660 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench