Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19795 (KAR)

SMT SHEETAL JAIN v. SMT. M VEENA

WP/7355/2022 · 2025-04-15

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15760 WP No. 7355 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT SHEETAL JAIN W/O RAJENDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.61 EWS LAYOUT KATHRIGUPPE BSK 3RD STAGE BANGALORE-560085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAKSHMISHA B S., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. M VEENA W/O SRI RAMESH BABU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.53/2, JAI GANESH BUILDING MOUNT JOY EXTENSION HANUMANTH NAGAR BANGALORE-560019. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANANTHA NARAYANA B N., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 05.02.2021 IN IA NO.1 UNDER ORDER 38 RULE 5 OF CPC AT ANNEXURE-A IN O.S.NO.4267/2020 PENDING BEFORE 12TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15760 WP No. 7355 of 2022 ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the suit itself has been decreed and he would file a memo to that effect in the Registry. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 25