S.PERUMALASAMY v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
WP/16432/2025 · 2025-06-02
N Anand Venkatesh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19793 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19793 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 16432 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 16432 of 2025 S.Perumalasamy S/o.Subbaiah, No.9, Mallika Nagar, Old Pallavaram, Pallavaram, Chennai-600043 Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Inspector General of Registration O/o The Inspector General of Registration, Mylapore, Chennai-04 2.The District Registrar, O/o The District Registrar, South Chennai Registration District, Chennai-15 3.Mr.P..Ravi Reddy, Tamil Nadu Reddy Nala Sangam, No.34/35, Walaja Salai, Chepakam, Chennai-600 002 Respondent(s) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 16432 of 2025 PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1 st and 2 nd Respondents herein to consider petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2025 and to take appropriate action against the 3 rd Respondent herein from using the name of the Association called the Tamil Nadu Reddy Nala Sangam. For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Ramesh Babu U.Yuvaraj V.Dhanalakshmi For Respondent: Mr.E.Vijay Anand (for R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 27.01.2025 wherein the petitioner is seeking for taking action against the 3 rd respondent from using the name of the association called as Tamil Nadu Reddy Nala Sangam. 2. Heard Mr.B.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.E.Vijay Anand, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the 3 rd respondent is misusing the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 16432 of 2025 name of the association and creating unnecessary problems in running the association. He is also creating confusion in the minds of the members of the Association. Hence, the president of the association lodged a complaint before the 2 nd respondent to initiate action against the 3 rd respondent. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court. 4. In the considered view of this Court, there is a dispute between the parties pertaining to running a registered society. This dispute cannot be resolved by the official respondents under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. These are matters which can be resolved only by a competent Court, since there is a dispute in the administration of the said society.
Hence, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court and work out his remedy. 5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 02-06-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rka 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 16432 of 2025 To
1. The Inspector General of Registration O/o The Inspector General of Registration, Mylapore, Chennai-04 2.The District Registrar, O/o The District Registrar, South Chennai Registration District, Chennai-15 3.Mr.P..Ravi Reddy, Tamil Nadu Reddy Nala Sangam, No.34/35, Walaja Salai, Chepakam, Chennai-600 002 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 16432 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. rka WP No. 16432 of 2025
Dated: 02-06-2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis