HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8996 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(a) To quash the impugned chargesheet dated 09.11.2014 arising out in case crime no. 339/2014, under section 323, 352, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)X SC/ST Act, relating to police station-P.G.L.. District-Lucknow. (b) To quash the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 419/2017; State Vs. Priyanka Mishra., arising out in case crime no. 339/2014, under section 323, 352, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)X SC/ST Act, relating to police station-P.G.I., District-Lucknow, (c) Meanwhile, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceeding of S.T. No. 419/2017; State Vs. Priyanka Mishra., arising out in case crime no. 339/2014, under section 323, 352, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)X SC/ST Act, relating to police station-P.G.I., District-Lucknow, in the interest of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh, Shanker Lal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Priyanka Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. October 17, 2025 Vinay/- A482 No. 8996 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench