Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19790 (JHR)

VIMAL KUMAR v. RINKU SINGH

A.C.(S.B.)/3/2024 · 2025-03-28

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.C. (S.B.) No.03 of 2024 ---- 1. Vimal Kumar, aged about 37 years, son of Late Vijay Kumar Singh 2. Mrs. Priti Kumari, aged about 32 years, wife of Vimal Kumar, Both residents of Mo2, Prakriti Vihar, Kadma, P.O.+P.S.- Kadma, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. …. …. Appellant(s) Versus 1. Rinku Singh wife of Kunal Singh, 2. Mr. Kunal Singh son of Late Dinesh Singh, 3. M/s MH Construction Co. All resident of 1C, 1st Floor, Prerna Sarla Apartment, Baradwari, P.O.+P.S.- Sakchi, Jamshedpur, Address – Vijay Garden, Baradwari, P.O.+P.S.- Baradwari, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. Aditee Dongrawat, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : ---- 06/Dated: 28th March, 2025 1. The present appeal has been filed for quashing the judgment dated 03.05.2024 passed by the Jharkhand Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi in Appeal No.12 of 2023 (Arising out of Complaint Case No.38 of 2021) whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal has been pleased to dispose of the appeal by setting aside the judgment dated 15.06.2023 passed by the authority in Complaint Case No.38 of 2021 and had remanded the matter to the concerned authority to hear and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter has been settled outside the court and she has instruction not to pursue the present case. 3. In view of above submission, the present appeal is hereby disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded