1 2025:CGHC:4179-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 39 of 2025 Ajay Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Tarachand Agrawal Aged About 68 Years R/o Ward No. 35, Seth Basant Lal Marg, Ambikapur, Tehsil- Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh (Address Wrongly Mentioned In Writ Petition As Jawahar Market, M.G. Road, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Sarguja (Ambikapur), District- Sarguja (C.G.) 4 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 6 - Dinesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Hari Prasad Soni Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Dutta Colony, Ambikapur, Tehsil- Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.23 16:49:55 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Vikram Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 5 and Mr. Pushkar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6. 2. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No. 6002 of 2024 (Dinesh Kumar Soni vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed off the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 6/writ petitioner. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that he has appellant herein was respondent No. 6 in WPC No. 6002 of 2024, which was disposed off by the learned Single Judge. Though he was the respondent No. 6 in the writ petition, but he was not heard. Therefore, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to take recourse of law before the learned Single Judge. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 herein, has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu