Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197892 (ALL)

DURGA PRASAD v. SRI ANIRUDH KUMAR YADAV TEHSILDAR TEHSIL SADAR DISTT. BAHRAICH

CAPL/2246/2025 · 2025-12-11

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2246 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred against alleged non-compliance of judgement and order dated 9.7.2024 whereby the writ court has directed to expedite the hearing of the proceedings filed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the compliance affidavit has been filed on 21/ 22.08.2025 enclosing therein the copies of the order dated 14.08.2025 passed in two cases filed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. 3. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant is unable to dispute the submission made by learned Standing Counsel, but he has submitted that only the notices were issued to the encroachers and the encroachment is still there. 4. At this stage, learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the applicant/ petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy to move an application under Section 214 of U.P. Revenue code, 2006 read with para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual to remove the encroachment. 5. On being asked from the learned counsel for the applicant whether the remedy is available with applicant to move an application for execution / implementation of order under Section 214 of U.P. Revenue code, 2006 read with Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, he has very fairly submitted that in case the order is not implemented, the remedy is available with him as stated above. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Nath Pandey, Devendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Durga Prasad .....Applicant(s) Sri Anirudh Kumar Yadav Tehsildar Tehsil Sadar Distt. Bahraich .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of above facts and circumstances, the present contempt application is devoid of merits and is, accordingly, dismissed. December 11, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 2246 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench