` IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA MONDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDD CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5736 OF 2025 Betwee n : E= [3505] '-I-'*¥fiT¥r* tt`¥.apf>,g; 1. NetrambakaLokesh, S/o.Surendra Aged about 29 years, R/o. Chinthopu Village TP Gudur MandaI, SPSR Ne]lore District 2. NetrambakaGopi, S/olSurendra Aged about 21 years, R/o. Chinthopu ViIIage'TP Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Petitioner/Accused No.A1 & A4 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh AtAmaravathi Respondent petition under Sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C) is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused No.A1 & A4 on bail in the event of hl's arrest in cr.No.108/2025 on the fl-le of TotapalliGudur PS, dated 03.04.2025 under Sections 126 (2),109 (1),118 (1) r/w3(5)ofB.N.S. - The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated 12.06.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of srl-c SUBODH, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following; ORDER: lt? THE HONOURABLE ~SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY £BIMINAL PETITION NO: 5736 OF 2P2§ ORDER: _-._` i____-----` `.` - The CrI-minaI Petitior], under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Its filed on behalf of the petitioners/Al and A4 to grant anticipatory bail I-n connection WI'th Crime No.108/2025 of Totapalli I Gudur Police Station, Sri Potti SrI-ramulu Nellore District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioners and others for the offences punishable under sections 126(2),109(1),118(1) read with 3(5) of B.N.S. In the present case, name of the petitioner No.2 i.e. Accused No.4, has been deleted from the case. 3. Case of the prosecution l'n brief, is thaton o1.4.2025 at about 5.30 pm, while the de facfo complainant was going to feed the fish ponds, along with his father, his paternal uncle and his son, to south Amuluru on a motorcycle and when they reached the house of Netrambaka Lokesh-Al house in Chintopu Village, N.Lokesh had a knife and sai pawan Reddy-A2, Devakumar-A3 and Netrambaka Gopi-A4 were standing on the road holding sticks and stopped them. Al stabbed his paternal uncle Saada Janardhan on his head and caused bleeding injuries, and also stabbed his paternal uncleJs son ThI|rumala with knife on his right ear and caused bleeding I-njury, and A.1 toA.4 beat the defacto complainant and others indiscrimI-nately and caused injuries. on that, the de facto complal-nant's father, along with villagers, intervened and saved them. The injured were admitted in the Government Hospital for treatment. I,sif3fZSI I- ~= `,.`-.. _.. ,S-`_-i -_ -- €=-=l -=¢ fr + 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Ass[-slant public Prosecutor for respondent-state. perused the record. 5. Learned Ass['stant public Prosecutor submits that I[nVeS{jgation Its going on and some more witnesses are to be examined. 6. A perusal of the material avaj[able on record goes to show that there are disputes between the petitioners and the de facfo complainant. [n pursuant to the`same, on o1.4.2025, when the de facfo complainant, along with others, was passing in front of the house of the petitioner No.1, jt Its alleged that the petjtjoners and others are alleged {o have armed wI-th knives, attacked them and caused injurI|eS. The incident Its Said to have taken place on o1.04.2025 and the police report was lodged on o3.04.2025. No complaint has been given to the police at the earliest. Going by the contents in the F.I.R., if really that such an I-nCident is said to have taken place and the de racfo complainant and others had gone to the Government Hospital for treatment, upon recording statement of injured, a case would have been regl-stered. Further, not taking treatment for a period of two days, there is any amount of ambiguity as to whether the I-nCiden{ iS Said tO have taken place as alleged. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court I-s I|nClined tO consider the prayer of the petitioners for grant of antjcipa,tory bail. 7. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest with regard to this crime, Petitioners/Al and A4 shall be released on bail on theI'r executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand orlly) each with two suretl-es for the like sum each {o the satisfaction of the arresting police officials S,,._- c'-<J9 --p_`_-I- I prl- E= ".qu- and also on condition that the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when requl-red and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the station House Offl'cer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 am and 05.00 pm, tj[I filing of the charge-sheet. 8. Accordingly,~the criminal petition is allowed. SD/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I To, 1. The V Additional D'lstrict & Sessions Judge : Nellore 2. The Station House Officer, TotapalliGudur Police Sta'tion. I 3. One CC to SRl. C SUBODH Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P [OPUC] I 5. Onesparecopy E= .\ HIGH COURT SRKJ DATED :30/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5736 of 2025 ALLOWED