UCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7488 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf respondent No.8 has been accepted by Sri Saurabh Singh and on behalf of respondent No.10 notice has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respoindents is dispensed with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only to prayer No.3 of the petition for expediting the restoration application dated 18.6.2024 filed against the order dated 22.8.2022 passed in case No.05046/2020, computerized case No.T 202008300505046 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code pending before opposite party No.2 i.e. Nayab Tehsildar, Paraspur, Tehsil Karnailganj, District Gonda, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 - Nayab Tehsildar, Paraspur, Tehsil Karnailganj, District Gonda is directed to decide restoration application dated 18.6.2024 filed against the order dated 22.8.2022 passed in case No.05046/2020, computerized case No.T 202008300505046 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udai Bhan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta, Saurabh Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Atul Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration Second Devi Patan Mandal Gonda And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench