Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197875 (ALL)

SAKSHAM FOUNDATION CHARITABLE SOCIETY THRU. ASHUTOSH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATIO

WPIL/3912/2018 · 2025-10-10

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3912 of 2018 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. This PIL has been filed by the Saksham Foundation Charitable Society seeking the following reliefs:- "i) To issue a writ, order or direction of or in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to take immediate steps to vacate the institution's land bearing Gata No. 3831, situated in village Gadan Khera, tehsil and district Unnao from illegal occupation of the private respondents; ii) to issue writ, order or direction of or in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to demolish the construction raised on the aforesaid piece of land; iii) to issue writ, order or direction of or in the nature of mandamus commanding the private respondents to pay adequate compensation to the Institution for illegal and unauthorized use and occupation of the latter's property; iv) to issue writ, order or direction of or in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to conduct an enquiry into the circumstances leading to transfer of possession of the institution's property to the private respondents and the trail of money, if any, involved among the interested parties; v) to issue a writ or direction of or in the nature of mandamus directing the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Chaturvedi, Rohit Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhineet Jaiswal, Gaurav Mehrotra, Lalit Shukla, Namit Shukla, Sonu Shukla, Yogesh Kesarwani Saksham Foundation Charitable Society Thru. Ashutosh Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Educatio .....Respondent(s) Government to take suitable action against the private respondents as well as the erring officers on the basis of outcome of the enquiry prayed for in the foregoing clause;" 2. Shri Abhineet Jaiswal, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4- Lucknow Industrial Development Authority, within whose jurisdiction the land is situated, says that the land was gifted to an institution i.e., opposite party no. 5 which is in possession, therefore, there is no cause of filing this PIL certainly not by the petitioner. The institution-opposite party no. 5 has not raised any grievance. 3. None appears for the petitioner to press this petition. It appears that the petition has lost its efficacy with the passage of time. 4. This PIL is, accordingly, disposed of. October 10, 2025 Shravan WPIL No. 3912 of 2018 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench