Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19787 (KAR)

RENUKAPPA G T @ RENUKA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7437/2022 · 2025-02-10

M G S Kamal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5844 WP No. 7437 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 7437 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. RENUKAPPA G T @ RENUKA S/O THIRUMALAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, BHOVI COLONY KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 2. ANNAPPA B S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT G.KOPPALU, KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 3. BASAPPA S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT G.KOPPALU, KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 4. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT G.KOPPALU, KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 5. ESHWARAPPA G S/O AJJAPPA Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5844 WP No. 7437 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, BHOVI COLONY KADUR HALLI POST, KADUR TALUK-577548 6. RAMAPPA W/O DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 7. SANNAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, BHOVI COLONY KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 8. RATNAMMA W/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, BHOVI COLONY KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 9. BHARATH S S/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT GEDLAHALLI, BHOVI COLONY KADUR HALLI POST KADUR TALUK-577548 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5844 WP No. 7437 of 2022 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE-560001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER KIADB, MANGALORE DIVISION, BYKAMPADI, BANGALORE-560001 4. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU-01 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE.N, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.B.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION EXERCISING THE POWER U/SEC 28(1) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT 1966 (HEREIN AFTER REFERRED TO AS 'ACT' FOR SHORT) FOR THE FORMATION OF SUVARNA KARNATAKA CORRIDOR IN NO.CI 438 SPQ 2009 DTD 30/11/2009 AND GAZZETED ON 15/12/2009 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 25/11/2017 IN NO. CI 241 SPQ 2017, VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND E ISSUED BY R- 3 AND ETC., - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5844 WP No. 7437 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that for want of instructions he was not able to prosecute the matter. Ultimately, he filed a retirement memo and issued notice seeking to retire from the matter to the petitioners on 10.01.2025 through registered post, and that said notice has been served on all these petitioners, yet there is no response from the petitioners. Hence, he seeks retirement from the case. 2. It appears from the submissions petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6