TAFJUL HUSSAIN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS
C.M.P./661/2024 · 2025-03-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19786 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19786 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 661 of 2024
------ Tafjul Hussain, aged about 67 years, son of late Ramzan Miya, resident of Village-Amnari, P.O.-Manari, P.S.-Muffasil, Dist.- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) … Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & Dist.- Hazaribagh
3. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Hazaribagh
4. The Circle Officer Sadar, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & Dist.- Hazaribagh
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Ravi, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III ------
Order No.04 Dated- 07.03.2025
Heard the parties.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 to its original file.
It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order of depositing Rs.1,000/- with JHALSA. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the concerned counsel was out of station due to family function hence, the said peremptory order could not be complied with. It is next submitted that the petitioner has complied the said peremptory order of depositing Rs. 1,000/- with JHALSA. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 and unless W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 be restored to its original file.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal.
List W.P. (C) No. 3558 of 2021 under the appropriate heading after a week.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/