Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197857 (ALL)

HANSANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9468/2025 · 2025-10-07

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9468 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Ms. Divya Singh, holding brief of Sri Abdul Samad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.4 not to harass the petitioner in the interest of justice. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1,2,&3 for taking appropriate action against the O.P no. 4 by for atrocities which is being done by the O.P. no. 4 against the petitioner." 3. Ms. Tripathi has informed, on the basis of instructions, that the petitioner is not being harassed by the police and the allegation against the police is false and misconceived. She has also stated that since the petitioner is an accused in one case relating to NDPS Act, therefore, for the purposes of interrogation, presence of the petitioner may be required. 4. Be that as it may, if the petitioner is involved in a case relating to NDPS Act, as FIR to that effect has been enclosed as Annexure No.6 with this petition bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0435 of 2021, under Sections 20/8 of NDPS Act, Police Station- Kheeron, District- Raebareli, the investigating agency may require the presence of the petitioner strictly in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abdul Samad, Divya Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Hansani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) accordance with law. 5. In view of the above, prayers of the writ petition are misconceived. However, it is needless to say that no citizen should be harassed by the police or any Government Agency without having any cogent reasons to that effect. 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. October 7, 2025 RBS/- CRLP No. 9468 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench