2025:JHHC:18281 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4036 of 2024 ---------- Manoj Kumar Ray, son of Bindeshwar Ray, resident of village Piprasole, P.O. Madhupur, P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 5. The District Education Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 6. The Block Education Extension Officer-cum-Coordinator, Block Resource Centre, Madhupur, P.O. & P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV ---------- 04/ 08.07.2025 In the instant writ application, petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents to release the arrears of honorarium along with current honorarium which has been stopped since September, 2015 and also allow the petitioner to mark his attendance. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by directing the concerned respondents to consider his case and pass necessary orders for payment of current and arrears of honorarium. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, the petitioner may be directed to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 3, who shall decide his case in accordance with law. 2025:JHHC:18281 2 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the Respondent No. 3 to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to the claim made by the Petitioner in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations, by passing reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The Petitioner shall serve a copy of this writ application to the concerned respondent so that his grievance can be redressed at the earliest. 6. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, the consequential benefits shall be extended to him within a further period of eight weeks. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-