Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197819 (ALL)

PAWAN SONI @ PAWAN SETH @ PAWAN KUMAR SETH v. AZAD SETH

A227/6256/2025 · 2025-10-17

S Q H Rizvi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6256 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the material available on record. 2. In view of the proposed order being passed, notice to the sole respondent is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought following prayer:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set aside the order dated 13.02.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 15, Sultanpur under Order 39, Rule 3 in Original Suit No. 124 of 2024 (Azad Vs. Pawan Soni)." 4. Submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondent having Original Suit No. 124 of 2024 (Azad Vs. Pawan Soni) is pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 15, Sultanpur. It is further submitted that due to the pendency of the aforesaid suit, the petitioner/defendant is facing undue hardship. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent herein/plaintiff is causing serious problems to the petitioner under the garb of the pendency of the said suit. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shravan Kumar Upadhyay, Lalit Narayan Mishra, Mamta Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pawan Soni @ Pawan Seth @ Pawan Kumar Seth .....Petitioner(s) Azad Seth .....Respondent(s) 5. It has also been pointed out by learned counsel for petitioner that the case got adjourned on several dates for one reason or the other causing inconvenience to the petitioner/defendant. 6. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending, as such, the same is being disposed of at the admission stage. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 15, Sultanpur to decide the said Original Suit No. 124 of 2024 (Azad Vs. Pawan Soni) as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law. October 17, 2025 Virendra A227 No. 6256 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench