HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 987 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard Sri Ashish Raman Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed by the Court, notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of his objections filed under Section 9-A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 pending before the Consolidation Officer. The record indicates that the Court had required the learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions vide order dated 24.02.2025 and on the basis of written instructions it has been informed by the learned Standing Counsel that since the petitioner himself is not cooperating, hence, the dates are being repeatedly fixed and even though on one hand the petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking expeditious disposal on 16.02.02025 but before the Consolidation Officer, he has not been appearing rather he has not even filed his evidence. Sri Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client would undertake that he would not seek any adjournment and would cooperate Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Raman Mishra, Himanshu Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Udyabhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Revenue Secy., Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) in early hearing. Considering the aforesaid, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending rather ends of justice can be met by directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- before the Consolidation Officer as security money to show his conduct and he shall not be entitled to any adjournment, he shall cooperate in early hearing and in case if the petitioner does not abide by the undertaking given, the security amount shall stand forefeited. However, in case if the deposits as aforesaid and the undertaking is furnished by 27th October, 2025, the Consolidation Officer shall take note of it and make an endevour to decide the matter expeditiously after affording full opportunity but without granting any unnecessary adjournments in light of the observations made hereinabove. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either parties on merits and the same shall be decided strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Asheesh A227 No. 987 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench