Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197811 (ALL)

ASLAM KHAN v. TEHSILDAR JUDICIAL, TEHSIL SADAR, BAHRAICH AND OTHERS

A227/6148/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6148 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil and District Bahraich to decide mutation case No.T 202408150101260 (Aslam Khan Vs. Fatima) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue ode, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil and District Bahraich is directed to decide mutation case No.T 202408150101260 (Aslam Khan Vs. Fatima) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue ode, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hom Narayan Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Aslam Khan .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Sadar, Bahraich And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench