HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14696 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Dr. Alok Saran, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the concerned opposite parties/ respondents 2 and 3 to release the postal retiral dues/ part of post-retirement dues (Death Claims) of late Prem Autar Srivastav in favor of the petitioner along with the interest and to consider the petitioner for compassionate appointment as per qualification within the stipulated time period which's pending since 28/11/2009. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the concerned opposite parties/ respondents 2 and 3 to pass such other order or direction, to inquire into the fraudulent withdrawal of retiral benefits by Mala Srivastav and take corrosive action." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam, Vidyut Parikshan Khand, Raebareli and the opposite party no. 3 may be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyanshu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Alok Saran Km. Lovely Kiran .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam, Vidyut Parikshan Khand, Raebareli within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14696 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench