RAJ NARAIN SHUKLA and ANR. v. BHIM SHANKER and ORS.
SAPLD/133/2019 · 2025-12-12
Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 133 of 2019 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case is called out in the revised call.
2. None is present for the appellants even in the revised list.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 12, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : K.K. Sharma, Sharavan Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Prashant Kumar,J.) Raj Narain Shukla And Anr. .....Appellant(s) Bhim Shanker And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench