Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010217472025 2025:GAU-AS:13650 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3146/2025 DHRUBA JYOTI PATHAK AND ANR S/O KANTESWAR PATHAK R/O VILL- OUMURA P.O. BHELLA P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM PIN-781309. 2: SAMAR JYOTI SARMA @ SAMARJYOTI SHARMA S/O AMARENDRA SHARMA R/O VILL- OUMURA P.O. BHELLA P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781309 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SK S N MOHAMMAD, FARNAZ N A HUSSAIN,MR A IKBAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 13.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. SK S N Mohammad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioners namely, 1. Dhruba Jyoti Pathak and 2. Samar Jyoti Sarma @ Samarjyoti Sharma, has prayed for bail in connection with Panbazar P.S. Case No. 259/2025 under Sections 103(1)/118(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The case arose out of an FIR dated 08.08.2025 lodged by police official with allegation about finding an injured person who taken hospital and subsequently dead. It is also alleged that another injured person found in that area and he was also hospitalized. It is also alleged that in the early hours, these victims were assaulted by some shopkeepers of that area suspected them of theft. Nine persons have been named as accused/suspect including the present petitioner. 4. The present two accused persons seeking bail were arrested on 09.08.2025 and presently in judicial custody. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners places orders of this Court granting bail to three co-accused, who are also named in the Page No.# 3/3 FIR. 6. The case diary has been received. 7. As per the prosecution, the investigation has progressed sufficiently but is not yet complete and it appears that the forensic report is awaited. 8. Considering the length of detention, progress of investigation and aspect of parity – the present two above-named accused persons are allowed to go on bail of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) only each with one surety each of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the concerned learned Court with following conditions: (i) That they shall not commit any illegal activities or offence; (ii) That they shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 9. Return back the case diary. 10. Violation of bail conditions might entail cancellation of the bail. 11. With the above observations, this bail petition stands allowed and stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant