AMOD KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/15045/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15045 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:-
"1.Issue a writ of mandamus comrnanding the opp. parties to grant all consequential service benefits including arrears of salary from the date of dismissal from service dated 4.3.2009 to the date of reinstatement in service dated 07.07.2015 with fixation of pay after giving increments to the petitioner in view of order dated 10.09.2024 passed by the opp. party No.3 forthwith."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director General of Police, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooqahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Amod Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench