Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197781 (ALL)

DAYARAM SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

/10191/2024 · 2025-11-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10191 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Dhananjai Kumar and Sri Shailendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Ashutosh Bajpai, learned Counsel for the complainant. The memo of appearance filed by Sri Shailendra Kumar Shukla on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.205 of 2024, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Hardi, District Bahraich. 3. In terms of the FIR allegations were that 07.06.2024, the mother of the informant had gone to the orchard when the applicant on account of old enmity attacked the mother with the use of iron rod and Banka and the grandmother trying to intervene was also beaten up. The injury report indicates the presence of as many as five injuries, which are on non-vital parts. The applicant is in custody since 08.06.2024 and is aged about 62 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the injuries, which are not on vital party and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 08.06.2024 and the applicant is aged about 62 years, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, Devendra Verma, Nitin Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashutosh Bajpai Dayaram Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Dayaram Shukla be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. 7. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. November 21, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10191 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench