V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13892 OF 2025 Between: Gaali Sambaiiah, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 55 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Potharlanka Village, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District (formerly Guntur District). ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Bapatia District at Bapatia. 3. The Joint Collector, Bapatia District at Bapatia. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, , Repalle Revenue Division, at Repalle, Bapatia District. 5. The Tahsildar, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District. 6. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District. 7. The Station House Officer, Kolluru Police Station Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District. 8. The Village Revenue Officer, Potharlanka Revenue Village, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District. 9. Asmathunnisia, W/o. Late. Mir Wahedullah, aged 87 years, R/o. D.No. 12-7-39, Hayath Khan Street Tarpet, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring Order in Rc. No. 188/2020-DT, dated 13.05.2025 passed by the 5th Respondent under Section 6 of Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, thereby directing eviction of Petitioners from agricultural landed property admeasuring Ac. 2.72 Cents covered by Sy. No. 544/3 of Ravilanka Village, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District, as illegal, irregular, irrational without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to interfere in any manner with peaceful possession of Petitioners over their said land, and pass. praying their not lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of Order i Rc.No. 188/2020-DT, in dated 13.05.2025 passed by the 5,th Respondent and consequently direct the Respondents not to evict the Petitioners from their agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 2.72 Cents covered by Sy. No. 544-3 of Ravilanka Village, Kolluru Mandal, Bapatia District, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. PETLURI NAGA RAJU Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 6 & 8: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.9: None appeared The Court made the following Order: vi 1 r*> HN, J Wp.No.13892 _2025 APHC010277052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] 0^ '■:h THURSDAY .THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13892/2025 Between: Gaali Sambaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PETLURI NAGA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE 2 HN, J Wp.No.13892 _2025 The Court made the following Order; 1. The petitioners are seeking a direction to declare the proceedings dated 13.05.2025 as illegal, irrational and arbitrary. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader si.ibmits that the respondent No.9 was issued DKT F^atta in the year 1989, and that the same is recorded the revenue records. in It is submitted that the petitioners are encroachers, and due enquiry was conducted by the competent authority. By proceedings dated 13.05.2025, the petitioners were directed to vacate the land admeasuring in Sy.No.544-3, Ravilanka Village, Kdlluru Mandal, Bapatia Ac.2.72 cents District. An appeal against the said order would lie before the District FBapatla. Collector The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred a revision, which is pending before the District Collector. It is left open for the 2 3. nd respondent to decide the issue on merits. This Court cannot interfere in the impugned proceedings. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY// To, OFFICER SECT 1. One CC to Sri. Petiuri Naga Raju . Advocate [OPUC] ^ High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Two CCS to GP for Home .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Three CD Copies [OUT] vt\a i HIGH COURT DATED:29/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13892 of 2025 ^ 0 I AUG 2025 p. ntSectipiL^y' Co DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS