Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197751 (ALL)

MAHENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1440/2025 · 2025-11-21

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1440 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.351 of 2024, under Sections 308(2), 318(4) BNS, P.S. Ajgain, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that son of informant was having a family dispute with his wife after which he left home. It was stated that the applicant who is clerk of a lawyer got formed certain documents. Allegations were levelled that threats were also issued and thereafter Rs 16 lakh was taken for which the informant had sold his property. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that huge allegations were levelled against the applicant without there being any material particulars with regard to the amounts which are allegedly paid in cash, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Mahendra Singh be released on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dileep Kumar Pathak, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Mahendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond of Rs 5000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1440 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench